Nevada Commission for the Reconstruction of the Virginia & Truckee Railway Questions? We've Got The Answers!

TrainCop.com -- Providing Oversight, Questions and Answers About the Railroad Sales Tax for Carson City Voters

Move Over, Fashion Police! It's the "Train Police"

Question 3 -- Why Have Project Costs/Mile Constantly Risen Since 1993 and Why Has There Been Continual Understatement of Project Costs Since 1993?

Has the V&T Recon Commission Ever Been Honest About Total Project Costs? Apparently Not!

Has there ever been an honest public estimate of the Re-con costs?

Inflation Doesn't Tell the Whole Story

ARTICLE TOPICS:

Back in 1993 This Was Supposed to be a $20 Million Project, Said Mayor Marv

As Recently as 2005 Mayor Marv Still Called This a $36 Million Project, While a 2005 Business Plan Said $28 Million

2008: $54 Million? $70 Million? What's the Truth?

WHAT IS THE HISTORY OF V&T RECON BUDGETS?

I'll deal with the second question first. There has been a fifteen-year history of understating the total costs of rebuilding the Virginia and Truckee Railroad.

Back in 1993/1994 a feasibility study was done. In this study, the cost estimate was over $19 million. The document made clear that all costs were not accounted for, and that several environmental studies would need to be done at added costs. The study also made clear that additional engineering would be needed beyond the $19 million estimate.

This estimate also included millions to purchase and refurbish the locomotive and equipment to run the tourist railroad. The construction costs were estimated at less than $15 million.

In 1995 Mayor Marv Teixeira testified to a state Legislative committee that the total costs of the railroad would be $20 million. The (then-named) Tri-County Commission was lobbying to get a state matching grant of $5 million if they could raise $15 million. It was estimated that a private fundraiser could raise $7 million, which never happened. Many claims were made that never bore fruit, beginning a long history of overselling this project.

Perhaps the most interesting claim made during this testimony was that not a dollar would be spent until all the money was raised.

FAST FORWARD TO 2005

At the September 1, 2005 meeting of the Carson City Board of Supervisors various people were lobbying the Supervisors to add the 1/8% sales tax so that $15 million could be raised in a bond issue. As it the case today, it was represented at the time that another $15 million would finish the project. Longtime Project Engineer Ken Dorr famously said, "Almost all of the funding is now in place." That was 2005. Now in 2008 they are asking for another $10 million from Carson City.

ALSO IN 2005

Mayor Marv Teixeira was back in his seat as Mayor of Carson City. At the SB 169 Legislative Hearing he presented documents claiming the project would cost $36 million. At the same time a "business plan" was floating around still claiming a total project cost of $28 million.

If anyone has specific questions or needs to see the documents, please email me at jim@traincop.com. The history of misrepresentations must stop!

NOW THE FIRST QUESTION, WHY HAVE PROJECT COSTS RISEN SO MUCH?

In any well-run government construction project, all the right of way would have been acquired first, then engineering and environmental analysis would have been done, then construction would start.

Instead the Commission chose to build this project piecemeal. Now, to get through the Carson River Canyon they must pay much higher prices for right-of-way than just a few years ago.

The claim is also made that inflation is responsible for rising budget costs. While this is partially true, the Commission is not telling the whole story. I have been told that the costs of dealing with the Bureau of Land Management is a significant cost that was never accounted for in public budgets. This helps explain why the Carson River Canyon Phase 3 was originally budgeted at $3.5 million, but now will cost between $12 and $16 million. The current cost of Phase 3 was originally represented as the entire construction cost!

NOT ALL THE COSTS IN THE COMMISSION BUDGET

It's interesting to note that some project costs are off-budget. The Attorney General has provided legal review, but has not been paid directly for that. NDOT adminstered the Federal Grant for Phase 1 and took a 5% or 10% cut of the funds. These numbers do not show up in the Commission project cost claims.

More interesting is the rumored plan to have Carson City parks and rec acquire one or more parcels of land in the Carson River Canyon and then assign the right-of-way to the Commission. These kinds of budget tricks belong in Washington, DC, not Carson City.

PART 2 -- NOT ALL COSTS IN THE COMMISSION BUDGET

Let's take an overview of where the project is at. The Commission has enough funding to get across Highway 50, and will have spent $37 million at that point. If they get the $10 million from Carson City in the November ballot measure, they will not have enough to finish Phase 3, the Carson River Canyon.

Here's the rest of what they have to do: Find a way around the sewer pipe at the mouth of Brunswick Canyon, acquire right of way and build track to the Drako way depot location, build a depot and shops at Drako way, acquire the Virginia and Truckee Railroad, extend the track and build a better depot in Virginia City, re-open Tunnel 6, choose a new operator if Sierra drops out, pay off the loan on the #18 locomotive and more.

The Commission might cut costs by stopping the train at Gold Hill. Do you think people want to ride the V&T tourist train and stop short of Virginia City?